Home

What is This?

The purpose of the site is to make available information on issues of social justice to everyone. For example, the conviction of Jeffrey Gafoor established beyond doubt the innocence of the Cardiff Five. It raised several issues which have not been discussed in mainstream media. These include the lack of aftercare facilities for them and the shamefully low tariff that the real murderer got. His punishment does not punish or deter the truly guilty from allowing the innocent to suffer.This site is intended to put useful information online and make it available to people who need it. We would like victims of miscarriages of justice to understand what is possible to achieve through various techniques in forensic science and to stimulate discussion on these issues. The sad fact is that those in positions of power and influence appear to have no intention of correcting such flaws.

The Fitted-In Project

09

Jan

wales online article PDF Print E-mail
Written by Satish Sekar   

A DNA database would help convict the guilty - and protect the innocent

reproduced with kind permission from http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

As the debate over a national DNA database continues, author Satish Sekar calls for its establishment to prevent future miscarriages of justice – but only if proper safeguards are in place

IT WILL probably never happen now, but I support a fully independent national DNA database that would contain at least the records of the DNA profiles of every citizen. However, I have always been unequivocally opposed to the records, DNA profiles and excess DNA being held or controlled by the police.

Read more...
 

30

Dec

An Outrage (Part One) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Satish Sekar   

Just over eighteen years ago the late Mr Justice (John) Leonard had the misfortune of sentencing three innocent men to life imprisonment. Some observers believed it was significant that he refrained from using the usual emotive language when passing sentence on Yusef Abdullahi, Stephen Miller and Tony Paris. After the longest murder trial in British history they were convicted of the murder of Lynette White, which occurred in the early hours of Valentine's Day 1988. At that time it was the most brutal crime of its type in Welsh history. White had been stabbed more than fifty times. Her throat had been slit from ear to ear. Her wrists had been slashed too and the attack had sexual overtones to it. It was on every level a bestial crime, complicated by the way she made her living.

Read more...
 

30

Dec

An Outrage (Part Two) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Satish Sekar   

Regardless of their innocence, tariffs – the minimum that must be served – had to be set. Back in 1990 the trial judge set out the amount that he or she believed should be served and that was then considered by the Lord Chief Justice, who could change that figure. Finally the Home Secretary had the ultimate power to determine the precise amount that would be served. The Cardiff Three received terms that reflected the brutality of the crime. Ironically they were longer than the tariff that was imposed on Gafoor.

Read more...
 

30

Dec

An Outrage (Part Three) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Satish Sekar   

More than two years after Gafoor finally took responsibility for murdering Lynette White, Mr Justice Royce gave his reasons for the tariff that he imposed – one that is widely viewed as an insult to justice, even though Royce cannot be blamed. While Gafoor enjoyed his ill-deserved freedom, the system of imposing tariffs changed. A decision in the European Court of Human Rights took the power to determine them away from the Home Secretary, yet bizarrely a decision that was supposed to give greater freedom to judges placed greater restraints on them.

Read more...
 

30

Dec

An Outrage (Part Four) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Satish Sekar   

Mr Justice Royce had set a total of nineteen and a half years after aggravating circumstances had been taken into account. He then had to consider mitigating factors. He said that Gafoor's age at the time of the crime and lack of pre-meditation provided some – albeit a small amount of mitigation. A guilty plea at the first opportunity entitles a defendant to a discount of one sixth. In this case that meant two and a half years. “There had been as far as the court was concerned uncertainty until the 4th July as to whether the defendant would indeed plead to murder,” opined Royce. “Although he had admitted the killing he had refused to answer other questions in interview about the circumstances. There is also material now before me confirming that the defendant post-sentence gave some assistance to the police in their investigation of how it came to be that innocent men were convicted of Lynette White’s murder.”

Read more...
 

30

Dec

An Outrage (Part Six) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Satish Sekar   

Jeffrey Gafoor is not the only British killer to allow innocent people to suffer for his crime, but he was the first to be brought to justice. It is fairly obvious that he will not be the last. Developments in forensic science, especially in DNA testing systems meant that it was likely that at least some miscarriages of justice could now be resolved. Gafoor is as despicable a criminal as one could have the misfortune to come across. Not only was he capable of a vicious murder, but he was content to allow innocent men and their families to suffer for his crime.

Read more...
 

30

Dec

An Outrage (Part Five) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Satish Sekar   

Jeffrey Gafoor can be considered for release by the Parole Board as early as February 2016. Had the Cardiff Three not had their convictions quashed in December 1992 they would only just have become eligible for parole recently, but they would have had significant difficulties that Gafoor does not and would not have faced. They did not plead guilty and they did not show remorse – they could not because they did not commit the crime they were convicted of. At that time they could not have been paroled as they would have been considered a continuing risk to the public due to their failure to address their offending behaviour and show remorse. And suppose they decided to lie and express remorse; they would then be asked to detail what happened – something they could not do as to this day they do not know.

Read more...
 

21

Dec

Was Justice Served? (Part One) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Satish Sekar   
Learnne Vilday, Angela Psaila and Mark Grommek never set out to bear false witness. They told the truth for months in several statements, but police would not accept it. They bullied, cajoled and abused them until they got what they wanted. These were weak people who cracked under pressure. Vilday was told that she could be prosecuted and her baby son effectively orphaned. She was shown pictures of young children to emphasise the point. She gave in to this manipulation by Mouncher in particular. Unlike Psaila and Grommek her acquiescence was protecting not just her own interests, but that of her infant son too.
Read more...
 
«StartPrev12345NextEnd»

Page 2 of 5
 

Get the book


fitted in book

Fitted In

Inscribed to you, signed by and direct from the author Satish Sekar.

Please email Satish@fittedin.com for details.

Fitted In - to Britain
£15.00

Fitted In - to Europe
£17.50

Fitted In - The Rest of the World
£20.00