|
The Fitted-In Project
|
|
Was Justice Served? (Part One) |
|
|
|
| | Learnne Vilday, Angela Psaila and Mark Grommek never set out to bear false witness. They told the truth for months in several statements, but police would not accept it. They bullied, cajoled and abused them until they got what they wanted. These were weak people who cracked under pressure. Vilday was told that she could be prosecuted and her baby son effectively orphaned. She was shown pictures of young children to emphasise the point. She gave in to this manipulation by Mouncher in particular. Unlike Psaila and Grommek her acquiescence was protecting not just her own interests, but that of her infant son too. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Was Justice Served? (Part Two) |
|
|
|
| | Learnne Vilday, Angela Psaila and Mark Grommek admitted responsibility for their lies and did so before Jeffrey Gafoor was brought to justice. In 1988 they were different people, living on the fringes of the law. They were then young people as vulnerable to manipulation as one could find. They put their pasts behind them. They have no significant convictions subsequently and Vilday became an exemplary mother – a person her children have been sentenced to do without. The infant she chose to protect in 1988 is now a young adult. She was threatened with prosecution in 1988 – a prosecution that former Detective Inspector Graham Mouncher threatened would effectively have orphaned that young child. She cracked in the face of unbearable pressure. She was wrong to do so, as she now admits, but who in that position would not have done as she did? |
|
Read more...
|
| Self-confessed perjurers Learnne Vilday, Angela Psaila and Mark Grommek will spend this Christmas behind bars for their part in one of Britain's most notorious miscarriages of justice. By their own admission they perjured themselves at the committal hearing in February 1989: in the first trial later that year and finally in the second trial in 1990, which resulted in the wrongful convictions of Yusef Abdullahi, Stephen Miller and Tony Paris. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
A Shoddy Prosecution (Part One) |
|
|
|
| In April 1996 a justifiably incandescent with rage David Jessel, the then presenter of Channel Four's sadly defunct Trial And Error, addressed the media brandishing a copy of Sir Phillip Otton's judgment. "This is yet another shoddy judgment in a shoddy case," fumed Jessel. It would take another seven years for the truth of just how shoddy the then Lord Justice Otton's judgment was to see the light of day. Gary Mills and Tony Poole had been convicted of the murder of Hensley Wiltshire in January 1990, after a year on remand, but it would take more than six years for the appeal to be heard and that judgment would be more than controversial – it was cravenly dishonest. Otton quoted a passage of an interview with Mills, arguing that it dispelled the prejudice of the refusal to disclose the statements of an eyewitness, Ian (Neville) Juke as the passage referred to claims allegedly made by Juke. Otton said, "Moreover, it was an accurate summary of the substance of Juke's second statement." But it wasn't. A fact that would be acknowledged by both police officers who conducted that interview in a libel trial two years later and many others too. Either Otton (sitting with Mr Justices Keene and Ian Kennedy as they then were) had not read Juke's statements and that passage of interview, or he had delivered a judgment that he must have known was untrue. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
He was on the Coral Sea – Working |
|
|
|
| "I was on the Coral Sea," sneered David Elfer QC at Yusef Abdullahi's lawyers eighteen years ago, after a jury in Swansea Guildhall returned a guilty verdict against the weight of the evidence. "I am innocent," Abdullahi told the jury, "you have taken my life away from me." Some members of the jury started crying – perhaps because they even believed him and realised that maybe, just maybe, they had just made a terrible mistake that would have devastating consequences. Such protestations of innocence are not unheard of, although most prosecutors conduct themselves with dignity – far more than Elfer showed, especially to fellow lawyers, who tend to show friendliness and even respect to each other. None of this was on display towards Elfer during the trial of the Cardiff Five – Yusef Abdullahi, John and Ronnie Actie, Stephen Miller and Tony Paris – and there was good reason. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
Thoroughly Discredited (Part One) |
|
|
|
| Disgraced expert witness Dr Michael Heath resigned as an Home Office pathologist two years ago. This followed a finding against him at the first Home Office Advisory Board tribunal into the competence of an experienced forensic pathologist, which led to a review of his involvement in several cases. But the then Attorney General chose not to conduct a thorough investigation of his previous cases and left it to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
An Independent Eye (Part Three) |
|
|
|
| There are thirteen criteria on sufficiency of evidence that Crown Prosecutors had to keep in mind when deciding whether a suspect should be prosecuted at that time, which are thoroughly rehearsed in my book with reference to this case – three did not apply and the other ten should have rung alarm bells. The CPS had an ongoing discretion to review the decision in the light of events even after deciding to prosecute beginning with the committal hearing, which was an old-style one that involved live evidence from the four main witnesses who either put the Cardiff Five at the crime scene or directly accused them of committing the murder. Learnne Vilday, Angela Psaila, Mark Grommek and Paul Atkins contradicted themselves, each other and irrefutable scientific evidence irreconcilably, but the magistrate committed the case for trial and instead of reviewing whether the case was appropriate for trial, both the police and CPS prepared for the first trial by trying to paper over the cracks that were becoming chasms. If the CPS reviewed the evidence again with reference to the Code for Crown Prosecutors, it reached the wrong conclusion – one that defied logic and the evidence, but the unexpected death of Mr Justice McNeill in February 1990 gave the CPS another chance to review the evidence – not only of those witnesses, but of all of them – and halt a prosecution that by now should have been clear was not justified by the evidence. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3 of 5 |
|
|
Get the book

Fitted In
Inscribed to you, signed by and direct from the author Satish Sekar.
Please email Satish@fittedin.com for details.
Fitted In - to Britain £15.00
Fitted In - to Europe £17.50
Fitted In - The Rest of the World £20.00
|