“I write what I like,” Assassinated anti-apartheid activist Steve Biko
Abysmal There are no saving graces over the collapse of the biggest ever trial over a miscarriage of justice. If you cannot prosecute public officials over a miscarriage of justice where there there is no credible doubt about innocence, then forget it – it will never happen. For the last 20 years we have championed not only the innocence of the Cardiff Five, but its potential to change the criminal justice system.
The collapse of the case against Graham Mouncher, Thomas Page, Richard Powell, Peter Greenwood, John Seaford, Michael Daniels, Paul Jennings, Paul Stephen sounds the death knell not just of police accountability, but the criminal justice system too, once and for all. It has become all but impossible to ever hold police officers responsible for their roles in securing miscarriages of justice and this was no ordinary one. It was unique.
Gregory Bull QC said that his client's innocence has been 'firmly established.' Er no it hasn't. Page is entitled to be presumed innocent because no jury was allowed to decide on his guilt or innocence, but there are some in this case who have been proved innocent. They are the Cardiff Five – the truly innocent victims of a shameful travesty of justice.
The late Yusef Abdullahi, John Actie, Ronnie Actie Stephen Miller and Tony Paris have been vindicated by the conviction of Jeffrey Gafoor. Instead of acknowledging their innocence, the defendants absurdly claimed that the Cardiff Five had committed the murder along with Gafoor. That mendacious accusation disgraces the criminal justice system. This was not a defence; it was character assassination.
There is not one scrap of evidence that proves any of the Cardiff Five knew or socialised with Gafoor, let alone committed that murder together. Furthermore, the forensic science proved them innocent and did so from the beginning. The jury in Swansea did not hear from an expert who reviewed the scientific evidence. He said that the blood distribution evidence clearly established that six men did not commit that murder together – one did. There never was any credible evidence suggesting otherwise. The science proved the Cardiff innocent. They are the only defendants in this wretched case to have been proven innocent.
Disgraceful The second trial of the remaining officers charged, Stephen Hicks, Wayne Pugh John Bryan Gillard and John Murray – Rachel O'Brien was found unfit to stand trial – will not take place because copies of a complaint by one of the Cardiff Five had not been disclosed. It had been destroyed and no note of the destruction recorded. Apparently this meant that the defence could not be confident that everything had been disclosed. When the Cardiff Five stood trial twice these same officers knew of a ore credible case against a white paedophile – Mouncher's prime suspect.
No doubt the champions of disclosure rights ensured that this was made available to the defence – er no. It emerged by accident because defence found it in undisclosed material. The Cardiff Five lost 16 yeas of their lives. This is the travesty not the time these officers awaited trial. Make no mistake, they have not been vindicated.
RIP Please be upstanding and observe a minute's silence for British justice which died in Swansea on December 1st 2011. The failure of this prosecution almost certainly means there will never be an investigation of the numerous failures of the rest of the criminal justice system, especially the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in allowing the original travesty of justice to be prosecuted in spite of the absence of credible evidence either. It can rejoice as its Jo Moore moment has arrived.
The Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer has said that he is “extremely concerned.” Where is the apology for the repeated failings of an atrocious original prosecution and numerous institutional failings that plagued this case – flaws which occur in many other cases too, especially. The chance to learn lessons has not been lost, it was thrown away and it will continue to leave a trail of devastated lives and cost a King's Ransom.
Appalling I have no confidence in the criminal justice system to put this right. It has betrayed the memory of Lynette White (the victim of the horrific murder), her family, especially her mother, the late Peggy Pesticcio, the entirely innocent Cardiff Five, their families and society too. We all deserved better – far better. We have all been robbed of justice.
As a result of this decision, there are no consequences for shocking policing and honest officers will be tarred with the brush of a frankly disgraceful investigation that wrongly convicted the late Mr Abdullahi, Mr Miller and Mr Paris. That is an injustice too, especially as while the original Lynette White Inquiry, headed by Detective Chief Superintendent John Williams was an utter disgrace, the second, led by Detective Superintendent Kevin O'Neill, which found the real killer, Jeffrey Gafoor was a fantastic model of modern investigative policing. O'Neill and his team did a superb job and despite the failure of this prosecution that should not be forgotten. I will tell that story in Beyond Doubt soon.
8 years ago the Cardiff Five became the first miscarriage of justice victims in the DNA age to be vindicated in Britain – resolved by the conviction of the real murderer. It meant that there was no doubt that they were undoubtedly innocent and that the alleged eyewitnesses, Learnne Vilday, Angela Psaila, Mark Grommek and Paul Atkins had perjured themselves when they said they saw the Cardiff Five at the scene or committing the murder. Atkins escaped prosecution, but Vilday, Psaila and Gromek pleaded guilty to perjury in 2008, after duress failed as a defence. At that trial defence, judge and prosecution all agreed that the police had forced them to lie. How on earth can these verdicts be reconciled with this failed prosecution?
The CPS decided to prosecute 13 police officers and two more witnesses as a result of the trial of Grommek, Vilday and Psaila. Mr Justice Sweeney, whose other claim to fame was prosecuting Michael Stone for the murders of Lin and Megan Russell and the attempted murder of Josie Russell, ten years ago, decision to halt the trial means that the only people held accountable for a scandalous miscarriage of justice that is likely to have cost a small fortune on its own, are three witnesses who had resisted shameful bullying for months before cracking under duress and were then prosecuted successfully for telling the lies they had been forced to tell.
For the last 8 years this case – one that should have led demands for justice throughout the criminal justice system – has been hijacked by silence and apathy and yes that includes media, who ignored not just this scandal but others too. Mr Abdullahi died young, shamefully betrayed by a callous system that ignored his plight. He was denied help despite a scheme existing to help victims of miscarriages of justice.
Despite being proved innocent, no national media highlighted this scandal even after his death. It could and should have led the way for others to secure justice and society a criminal justice system that is both efficient and fair. Instead we are to get another inquiry to be conducted by agents of the same system that has failed miserably at every turn to deliver justice. Enough. It is time for a fully independent public inquiry into the functioning of the whole criminal justice in South Wales. Nothing less will do. They have proved that they cannot be trusted to put their house in order. The government must act now if it cares about restoring public confidence.
Rarely has there been a more disgraceful travesty of justice than this. There was no credible evidence whatsoever that proved the Cardiff Five guilty. Reams of evidence was never disclosed to their defence. The irregularities were legion, but they were never commented on, let alone acknowledged. Funny how that never mattered and they were left to rot in jail for a barbaric crime they did not commit. The prosecution of the Cardiff Five resulted in disgraceful convictions. The scientific evidence proved the Cardiff 5 innocent and did so before they stood trial.
Ms White's murder was at the time the most brutal murder of its type in Welsh history. There was no scientific evidence against any of the five men who stood trial twice in 1989 and 1990 and it was clearly saying even then that there was only one killer, whom we now know was Gafoor acting on his own. The Cardiff Five did not know him; he did not even occur as a suspect originally. How could they have failed to prove any link between them over 23 years if they knew each other well enough to commit this murder together? How could five of them have not left so much as a single cell of DNA at the scene or on the victim or have any trace of her blood on them, while Gafoor shed plenty at the scene? Such a scenario would be rejected as utterly implausible even on television.
Abdullahi had a very strong alibi that he was working on a ship throughout the night of February 13th-14th 1988. Yet again justice has been denied by not only refusing to acknowledge the obvious, but by insisting that the wronged and entirely innocent Cardiff Five were in fact guilty. They were not. They, unlike the 10 defendants whose case collapsed yesterday, really have been proven innocent. Gafoor said so and more importantly so did irrefutable forensic science. To accuse them again disgraces every concept of justice and those prepared to do so, because the evidence proved those claims false.
Stephen Miller's conviction was quashed in 1992 because he was bullied and hectored shamelessly by police despite the presence of a solicitor. The Lord Chief Justice at the time, Lord Taylor, said he never wanted to hear interviewing like that again, but even then a clear pattern emerged. The criminal justice system was to be protected at all costs. The appeal judges exonerated the second trial judge the late Mr Justice Leonard because the bullying had not been played to him by Miller's thoroughly inefficient QC, the late Roger Frisby, while failing to point out that the very same bullying that 'horrified' them had been heard and ignored by the first trial judge, the late Mr Justice McNeill.
The Crown Prosecution Service ignored its own Sufficiency of Evidence criteria to prosecute an appalling case. Requests for an explanation of their decision to prosecute in spite of the lack of credible evidence have been stone-walled by the CPS for the best part of 15 years. The police had blood that had been shed by the real murderer all along. It was later identified by DNA techniques not available in the 1980s as belonging to Gafoor. It proved that he and him alone had murdered Lynette White. Jeffrey Gafoor murdered Lynette White, Sadly every concept of justice was slaughtered afterwards. I for one, not only want a refund for the public, but those responsible to be surcharged and an independent public inquiry into the appalling performance of the criminal justice system in this case and others. Anything less is the final betrayal of justice.
Editor's Pick of Comments
I was the leading counsel for Yussef Abdullahi in both of the original crimes. Abdullahi was one of the three convicted at the end of the second trial. I was always convinced of his innocence because the evidence against him did not amount to a row of beans and more importantly because of being with him for so long, I never had any gut feeling of guilt. His police interviews were a disgrace. He was shouted and screamed at by a succession of police officers. Throughout he maintained his alibi of working on the "Coral Sea" as a member of a party doing repair work on that ship. He behaved with dignity. The police did not. The lead defendant in the recent trial, Graham Mouncher even spent much of his time interviewing Abdullahi screaming at him saying that "he was a disgrace to the human race". The evidence against him was nugatory and consisted of a failed effort to destroy his alibi and the misuse of evidence involving the mother of his children. An attempt to link Abdullahi with forensic evidence of a blood link failed completely. This episode did not show the Forensic Science Service in a very good light.
The police who conducted this enquiry were very badly led and it seemed they were even encouraged to transgress the normal role of a proper police force by ensuring that the evidence was manufactured, witnesses were coached, known perjurers were tolerated and all in the name of getting "a result". Sadly the then South Wales police were totally incapable of using any form of reason in their enquiry. They resorted to bullying, lying, and preventing the defence from having access to material which might have been of assistance to the defence. That is why it is so very ironic that those being prosecuted were freed on the basis that they could not get a fair trial because material was unavailable.
The people of South Wales were not provided with the police force which they deserved. Staying in Swansea for nearly two years, I came to respect all of them for being kind and warm. They now have a police force which uses reason as a proper tool of investigation instead of shouting, plotting and the use of nefarious methods. This is shown by the simple fact that they reexamined the evidence again carefully and found evidence which led to the plea of guilty from the real killer. Satish Sekar, who has not made any money as is claimed by Powell, became an expert on the details of the case. It was he who inspired the appeal which led to the acquittal of the three defendants by the then Lord Chief Justice, Lord Taylor and also persuaded the newly appointed leaders of the South Wales Police to reopen the case of who had killed Lynette White. To my mind it is significant that the appeal was due to last 2-3 weeks but lasted less than three days. All three judges were appalled by the tapes of the interviews with Stephen Miller. There was shouting and screaming by the police in those interviews. I was amused that the police officer responsible, Greenwood, made himself scarce at the appeal after the first tape was played. It was typical of the then South Wales police that they ignored any advice as to the conduct of interviews. Their appalling behaviour did lead to changes to prevent such abuse ever occurring again. Satish Seekar also played a part in the reopening of the enquiry.
I was not able to develop the case for Abdullahi at the appeal. I was going to show that the police had failed in their duty to disclose material to the defence and that this was deliberate. That is why I assert that it is ironic that this latest trial should have failed over the fact that evidence had been destroyed.
If there is to be any enquiry as to what happened, it should concentrate on why there were so many miscarriages of justice in South Wales for such a long period. It was the failure of the then leadership of that police force to behave reasonably and intelligently that caused so many failures. This is a long list of innocent people who have had cases manufactured against them.
The whole sorry story reveals a failure by a police force incapable of conducting a rational enquiry into a very nasty murder and one that was morally bankrupt as is shown by its repeated failures in murder cases over a long period. The real consolation from such a prolonged series of miscarriages of justice is that lessons have been learned and that such errors are unlikely to happen again. However it is always very important to monitor the police carefully in any open society. The people of South Wales did not deserve the police which they had over 20 years ago
|
The police who conducted this enquiry were very badly led and it seemed they were even encouraged to transgress the normal role of a proper police force by ensuring that the evidence was manufactured, witnesses were coached, known perjurers were tolerated and all in the name of getting "a result". Sadly the then South Wales police were totally incapable of using any form of reason in their enquiry. They resorted to bullying, lying, and preventing the defence from having access to material which might have been of assistance to the defence. That is why it is so very ironic that those being prosecuted were freed on the basis that they could not get a fair trial because material was unavailable.
The people of South Wales were not provided with the police force which they deserved. Staying in Swansea for nearly two years, I came to respect all of them for being kind and warm. They now have a police force which uses reason as a proper tool of investigation instead of shouting, plotting and the use of nefarious methods. This is shown by the simple fact that they reexamined the evidence again carefully and found evidence which led to the plea of guilty from the real killer. Satish Sekar, who has not made any money as is claimed by Powell, became an expert on the details of the case. It was he who inspired the appeal which led to the acquittal of the three defendants by the then Lord Chief Justice, Lord Taylor and also persuaded the newly appointed leaders of the South Wales Police to reopen the case of who had killed Lynette White. To my mind it is significant that the appeal was due to last 2-3 weeks but lasted less than three days. All three judges were appalled by the tapes of the interviews with Stephen Miller. There was shouting and screaming by the police in those interviews. I was amused that the police officer responsible, Greenwood, made himself scarce at the appeal after the first tape was played. It was typical of the then South Wales police that they ignored any advice as to the conduct of interviews. Their appalling behaviour did lead to changes to prevent such abuse ever occurring again. Satish Seekar also played a part in the reopening of the enquiry.
I was not able to develop the case for Abdullahi at the appeal. I was going to show that the police had failed in their duty to disclose material to the defence and that this was deliberate. That is why I assert that it is ironic that this latest trial should have failed over the fact that evidence had been destroyed.
If there is to be any enquiry as to what happened, it should concentrate on why there were so many miscarriages of justice in South Wales for such a long period. It was the failure of the then leadership of that police force to behave reasonably and intelligently that caused so many failures. This is a long list of innocent people who have had cases manufactured against them.
The whole sorry story reveals a failure by a police force incapable of conducting a rational enquiry into a very nasty murder and one that was morally bankrupt as is shown by its repeated failures in murder cases over a long period. The real consolation from such a prolonged series of miscarriages of justice is that lessons have been learned and that such errors are unlikely to happen again. However it is always very important to monitor the police carefully in any open society. The people of South Wales did not deserve the police which they had over 20 years ago